Commissioners of Finance and Accountants General of the 36
states of the federation on Tuesday distanced themselves from claims by the
former Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, that they were part of the
decision to withdraw and spend $2bn from Nigeria’s excess crude oil revenue
account last December.
Edo State governor, Adams Oshiomhole, and his Kaduna State
counterpart, Nasir El Rufai, had, after the National Economic Council (NEC)
meeting in Abuja on Tuesday last week, accused Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala of
unilaterally approving the withdrawal of about $2.1 bn from the $4.1 bn left in
the Excess Crude Account (ECA) last November “without authorization”.
But in a swift reaction, the former Minister had vehemently
rejected the accusation, describing allegations linking her to the allegations
as “false, malicious and totally without foundation”.
Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s reaction, conveyed through a statement by
her Media Adviser, Paul Nwabuikwu, said all expenditures from the ECA “were
discussed at meetings of the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC)
attended by finance commissioners from the 36 states”.
“It is curious that in their desperation to use the esteemed
National Economic Council for political and personal vendetta, the persons
behind these allegations acted as if the constitutionally recognized FAAC, a
potent expression of Nigeria’s fiscal federalism, does not exist,” she said.
But in a stern reaction on Tuesday in Abuja, members of the
FAAC, under the aegis of the Forum of Commissioners of Finance, disowned the
former minister, describing her claim as “misleading and far from the fact”.
“It has come to our notice the statement credited to the former
Coordinating Minister of the Economy and Honorable Minister of Finance, Dr.
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, that the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC)
approved the withdrawal from Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of Two
Billion U.S. Dollar ($2,000,000,000.00),” the commissioners said.
“This statement is far from the fact and is misleading,” the
statement said.
The FAAC meeting for November 2014 ended in confusion when the
then Minister of State for Finance, Bashir Yuguda, could not explain how the
balance in the ECA had dropped from $4.1 bn at the end of October to $3.1 bn.
Prior to the October FAAC meeting, Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala had told
reporters that the balance of the ECA stood at $4.11bn, while the country’s
external reserves rose from $36.6bn in June to $39.48billion as at October 16.
Regardless, the then Chairman of the Forum of State
Commissioners of Finance and former Ebonyi State Commissioner of Finance,
Timothy Odaah, had denied knowledge of any decision to withdraw from the
account, insisting that none of its members was aware of the withdrawal.
“No state knew how the $1 bn difference reported in the Excess
Crude Account balance, between October and November, came about,” Mr. Odaah
told reporters then. “The discrepancy has been noted for discussion at the next
FAAC meeting. It calls to question how transparent the management of the excess
crude revenues has been.”
Till the end of his tenure, Mr. Odaah, who later claimed
reconciliation was ongoing with the Finance Minister, did not reveal his
findings.
However, several months later, Mr. Oshiomhole stirred the
controversy afresh last week with the allegation that the former minister was
economical with the truth about the country’s finances.
Mr. Oshiomhole had lambasted Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala over her claims that
Nigerians knew what the three tiers of government usually collect through the
State Finance Commissioners who usually attend the monthly FAAC meetings.
The power to take money from the ECA, Mr. Oshiomhole argued, is
vested in the NEC, an institution created by the constitution, and not State
Finance Commissioners, who are not known by the constitution.
In disowning Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala, the Commissioners’ Forum
pointed out that the law setting up FAAC, which predates the ECA, “cannot
approve withdrawal and has not done so in the past.”
If anything, the Commissioners said, records of FAAC meetings
show that members have always queried the activities on the ECA, and therefore
did not decide any withdrawal.
Although the Commissioners said they observed the withdrawal of
$2bn from the ECA in December 2014, the then Minister of State Finance and
Chairman of FAAC, Mr. Yuguda, had explained during plenary that approval came
from former President Goodluck Jonathan.
The withdrawals were to help pay subsidy claims to oil
marketers, who had threatened to stop importing petroleum products.
“FAAC did not and could not have approved, nor took the decision
to withdraw the sum of Two Billion U.S. Dollar ($2,000,000,000.00) from the
Excess Crude Account,” the Commissioners said.
No comments:
Post a Comment